7 October 2015
I had a very long day in Paris since 7am and I was beyond knackered when I got back to my hotel room to take a shower, change, and head off to dinner. Tonight is one of the up-and-coming stars of this city, Akrame. It currently boasts 2 Michelin stars and I was certainly hoping for a far better experience than last night’s disaster at the no-star and no-hope Hexagone.
I got to Rue Lauriston at about 7.45pm, a little before my 8pm booking, so wandered around a little. Nothing much in the area, just smelly rubbish left outside, so just waited outside the restaurant. When the clock struck eight, there was a procession of people waiting to go into the restaurant. The first hiccup happened when the staff thought I was with the gentleman in front of me in the queue…sadly wee bit of unpleasant racial profiling there despite the staffer being of a visible minority himself…
In any case I was given a nice table and I relaxed. They recommended a simple glass of white to start so I did that. The menu is a set menu, with the only choice being the meat item and also an extra dish of ceps or not. I made my choices and they were okay with that plus a pairing. Let’s hope it runs smoother than last night…
I chilled out before a selection of amuse bouche arrived. They came so quick unfortunately the photos didn’t turn out very well. But they ranged from a cute parmesan “Oreo” cookie to a guacamole cracker. Nothing too mind-bending or memorable, but an interesting set of nibbles before the course menu begins. I see the creativity here.
The first pour of the pairing came and then the first dish, the “vegetable” item.
We have a tasting of tomatoes, with a small touch of burrata. A very relaxed dish, perhaps too relaxed. I wish there was something closer to a caprese with more green elements. Plus the tomatoes were a bit too similar, not enough contrast by the ones they chose; it seems it was more visual than taste, sadly. Having been through an amazing “tomato tasting dinner” at Il Grano in Los Angeles, I’ve become very picky about dishes that focus on tomatoes…
In any case, we continue into the meal with the so-called “iodine” dish, focusing on the mackerel.
This was actually a serving of mackerel tartar within the spinach leaf. The fish was excellent, balanced by the leaf. That white foam was totally unnecessary. A solid dish, good quality fish — exactly what I was hoping for this evening. I relaxed and smiled.
The place was pretty busy but getting busier every minute as more people come into the small-ish restaurant. I had a pretty clear view of the kitchen, so I can see what was happening. But as the menu was so rigid with little in ways of mixing things up, there is little excuse for the kitchen to not execute well. In any case, the third dish of the night appeared, the so-called “innovative” dish…
And yes it was indeed. The first part that arrived was actually the glass, where the essence of crab combined with wee bit of tea, was delivering an aroma from the heavens. The dish itself, based on crab and avocado, was very nice, a solid tasting of good crab. The glass itself was better for the nose than tongue, as it was actually seasoned too lightly. So I kept it for my nose most of the time with this dish before drinking it. A nice little experiment, but I still remember better play with crab at the now-shuttered L2O in Chicago (which was also 2-Michelin when I visited, it having lost its 3rd star for some bogus reason).
In any case, so far so good. Maybe I’m being hyper-critical but I think people need to realise that there’s restaurants as good as (or often, better) in places that are not named New York, London, Paris and Copenhagen…
The next dish soon appeared with another so-so pairing, this one the “shell” dish — langoustine.
An excellent dish, the langoustines were beautiful. Cooked well, and flavourful. The cockles added a nice little touch, the berry flavouring as well. Done very well, very good smoke used for the dish. Just wish there was a little more! Excellent stuff. I was pretty happy so far. Sure, not quite as good as the awesome one at Koks in Tórshavn, but not much is… I digress…
The service has been pretty smooth though one issue — the water glass they use is solid black, so the servers often have no idea if they are full or empty. And with the water bottles out of reach, it’s actually a bit of an annoyance as they frequently do not check. The wine pairing has been so-so also, nothing to write home about…
At this point we have the additional course that I agreed to, the ceps…
Well, it was far better than yesterday’s meek offering at Hexagone. The aroma was once again beautiful, but we have a bit of the Parisian cooking syndrome here with a creme that took too much out of the ceps. If you are gonna have this dish as an addition, to focus on the beautiful produce, why lob it into something that just fights the natural goodness of the ceps? This is really do not understand. It is not complementary when it overwhelms. A bit of a waste, to be honest.
The “cep water” presented from cooking these things had a wonderful aroma, nearly as good as the crab broth earlier, but even blander. Lack of seasoning once again. I don’t understand. The dish is overwhelmed with foreign substances, but the broth is undertouched and thus watery and bland. Oh well…
We shift back to the “normal” menu at this point with the “sailor” dish that points to seafood…
Yep, skate wing is somewhere in this concoction… This was the poor dish of the night. The fish was cooked poorly, dry and way overdone. It was like eating some cafeterial fish that’s been sitting in the hotplate since the morning. Tragically poor, how did they think this was tasty? Maybe that’s why it had a healthy portion of black butter, as the fish was drier than the Sahara. Goodness, this is really poor…
And also, the sommelier screwed up the pairing for this dish as they did not explain that the pour of the same wine for the previous “cep water” was actually too early of a pour of the same (lazy) wine meant for the skate. This is actually pretty poor for a 2-Michelin restaurant. Very poor, and he scowled when he topped off the glass. I find this “blame the diner” attitude piss poor, reminding me of the not-lamented disaster in NYC called Corton…
At this point my previous happiness, which had already withered into mere contentment, has now totally sunk into disappointment. Paris is just failing me once again. But this dinner was approaching the later phase, so I just bit my tongue and trudged on. Oh, how disappointing again…
The last savoury dish was next, and it was the “meat” dish that we could choose from a few options — veal, lamb, and sweetbreads. They recommended the sweetbreads, so I went with it. Frankly if Paris can’t do sweetbreads right, then there’s little reason to eat here. And it soon appeared…
A very healthy serving I must say, but that’s half the picture. It was cooked well, but the quality of the sweetbreads were not that great. I’m usually not a big fan of sweetbreads compared to other offal, and this dish actually put sweetbreads further down the totem pole for me. Average at best, nowhere near the awesome-cooking-rubbish-service Álbora in Madrid. Frankly when this was our only choice, the kitchen didn’t do much good. Even more disappointing…
Then after a nice palate cleanser of “mojito ice” we shifted to the “creamy” dish — which in Paris means something cheese…
Yep, and it was a nice goat cheese of which I didn’t get the name of, though a goat cheese. But it was pretty good, solid and uncompromising. Aside from the langoustine dish this was the strongest total package of the evening.
Then finally we drifted to the finale, the “sweetness” portion that had several components…
The beet gelato wasn’t bad, the chocolate-filled dumpling was also pretty good. But at this point I was tired and had enough. And I was thirsty, as I was lacking water all night — plus the pairing pours were rather skimpy. The Michelin disease… Anyway, I had coffee and settled up when the petits were presented.
I headed out a touch less than satisfied with this dinner. Supposedly one of the rising stars of the Paris kitchens, this dinner did not convince me of anything except the future of Parisian cooking will be as unexciting as it is now. Frankly the huge influx of Japanese chefs may be the saving grace of Paris — to convince Paris that the joy of excellent cooking is in the main ingredients, not from the sauces and adulterations that has come to define Parisian haute cuisine.
We’re not in the 19th century anymore, the ingredients are not rotting en route needing that sauce-y masque…
Anyway, a disappointment. I just want to get some sleep now…one more dinner left in Paris. Sigh…
Akrame**
19 Rue Lauriston
Paris, France